If every U.S. family replaced one regular light bulb with a CFL, it would eliminate 90 billion pounds of greenhouse gases, the same as taking 7.5 million cars off the road.
Despite growing resistance to the Cyber Intelligence Sharing and Protection Act, CISPA has cleared its first legislative hurdle. But the battle over the widely-criticized information-sharing bill is just heating up.
In an earlier-than-expected vote Thursday evening, the House of Representatives voted 248 to 168 in favor of the bill, which was originally designed to allow more sharing of cybersecurity threat information with government agencies.
The legislation has drawn the ire of legislators, civil liberties groups, security practitioners and professors, and hundreds of thousands of petitioners, who say the bill tramples over users’ privacy rights as it allows Web firms like Google and Facebook to give private users’ information to government agencies irrespective of other laws that protect users’ privacy. “It’s basically a privacy nightmare,” says Trevor Timm, a lawyer and activist with the Electronic Frontier Foundation. “CISPA would allow companies to hand over private data to the government without a warrant, without anonymity, with no judicial review.”
But even before it passed, the House voted to amend the bill to actually allow even more types of private sector information to be shared with government agencies, not merely in matters of cybersecurity or national security, but in the investigation of vaguely defined cybersecurity “crimes,” “protection of individuals from the danger of death or serious bodily harm,” and cases that involve the protection of minors from exploitation.
That statute, which in effect widened the most controversial portion of the bill just hours before it came to a vote, is sure to draw even more heat as the bill works its way through the legislative branch and reaches President Obama’s desk. The president currently backs a bill in the Senate put forward by Senators Joe Lieberman and Susan Collins, designed to increase the cybersecurity regulatory powers of the Department of Homeland security, which has been opposed by the GOP and stalled in the legislature.
The White House came out Wednesday with a strongly-worded statement slamming CISPA and pushing its regulatory approach in a threat to veto CISPA, writing that “cybersecurity and privacy are not mutually exclusive” and calling CISPA an intelligence bill rather than a security bill that treats civilians as subjects of surveillance. (White House watchers have observed, however, that the president’s advisors similarly recommended that he veto the National Defense Authorization Act, which he instead signed into law.)
Regardless, reconciling the House bill in its new, even more controversial form with a Senate version, even as the White House opposes the central thrust of the legislation, will only rekindle the controversy that has grown around CISPA in the last week.
The EFF’s Timm says he sees the House’s early vote on CISPA as an attempt by its author, representative Mike Rogers, to squeeze the bill through before its opposition grew any stronger. “We’ve seen an explosion of a variety of groups and congressmen coming out against the bill,” he says. “As the Senate debates this, it’s good that privacy and civil liberties will be front and center.”
also check out:
CALL YOUR REPRESENTATIVES/SENATORS/GOVERNMENT
reblog as many times as possible to get people to read about this and sign the petition. Click here for more info on CISPA
it would be great if people realized how serious this was…
it’s awesome to see how many notes this is getting, keep spreading the word guys!!!! We have ‘til Frday!!!
Myth #1: Condom use decreases one’s libido, causes impotence, and reduces or interferes with sexual pleasure.Truth - There is no evidence to suggest that condom use causes impotence. Impotence has many causes, some physical and some emotional. Condoms themselves do not cause impotence. One may only experience problems with keeping an erection while wearing an UNLUBRICATED condom. Some couples may experience a decrease in sexual excitement while stopping to put on a condom, but seriously… wouldn’t you rather have safe sex than have to worry about the risk of pregnancy or an STD/STI?
Myth #2: Condoms can easily get lost in one’s vagina or uterus and can travel through the body, requiring surgery to get the condom out.Truth - About 2% of condoms break or slip off completely during sex, primarily because they are used incorrectly. Holding the rim of the condom against the base of the penis when withdrawing after ejaculation can prevent the condom from slipping off and into the vagina. In the case that it does slip off, it will not go further than inside the vagina (no surgery needed). If at any point during sex, anyone notices the condom is broken/breaking or has slipped/is slipping, do not hesitate to bring it up! Discuss your options.
Myth #3: Condoms constrict an erect penis, causing premature ejaculation.Truth - Using a condom does not cause premature ejaculation. Condoms can help users maintain an erection longer and prevent premature ejaculation.
Myth #4: Condoms encourage infidelity, promiscuity, or prostitution.Truth - Evidence shows that condom use (or any other forms of contraception) does not affect sexual behavior. In fact, using contraception shows responsible behavior in order to avoid unintended pregnancy and STDs/STIs.
Myth #5: Condoms are not effective in preventing pregnancy or STDs/STIs, including HIV.Truth - Condoms are the only contraceptive method that can protect against both pregnancy and STDs/STIs, including HIV transmission, when used for vaginal, oral, or anal sex. Condoms are most effective WHEN USED CORRECTLY. The risk of pregnancy or contracting STDs/STIs is greatest when condoms are not used correctly with every act of sex. Condoms do not have holes that HIV can pass through. When used consistently and correctly, condom use prevents 80% to 95% of HIV transmission that would have occurred without condoms.
Good morning, here’s what we’re following:
And did you see…